Is your data an asset, or a liability?
Most teams spend the last week of the quarter chasing numbers that should already agree. This is a straight 0–100 score on the four things that decide whether your data pulls its weight — and the one fix that would change the most.
- 01 Trusted data do your systems agree?
- 02 Clear reporting can leadership act on it?
- 03 Reliable automation does it run without heroics?
- 04 Confident compliance ready when someone asks?
There are no right answers here — an honest read is the only thing that makes the score useful to you. Nobody sees it but you. Tap, or press 1–5.
First — who's answering?
Optional — it never changes your score, just sharpens the read at the end. Skip it if you like.
A number in the board report gets questioned in the room. What happens next?
The foundation everything else sits on. Answer for a normal week — not your best one.
- Finance, the registration system, and the CRM all show the same numbers — without anyone forcing them to match.
- Units, sales, and collections live in one agreed place, not three spreadsheets that drift apart.
- When a number is challenged, we can trace it back to its source in minutes, not days.
- A new transaction is entered once, not typed again into other systems.
- We trust the month-end figures the first time; errors rarely surface after sign-off.
- Our property, tenant, and owner records are clean — few duplicates, blanks, or out-of-date entries.
- We could hand our data to an auditor or buyer tomorrow without cleaning it up first.
Leadership asks, plainly, “how are we actually doing?” How fast — and how sure — is your answer?
The part leadership actually sees. Picture your last close — the real one.
- The board report is built the same way every period, not rebuilt from scratch.
- Leadership gets the numbers when they need them, not weeks after close.
- Our reports answer “so what do we do?”, not just “here's what happened.”
- We can break the numbers down by project, unit, channel, or community without a custom one-off report.
- Two people pulling the same report get the same answer.
- Reporting doesn't depend on one person who knows where everything is.
- We compare to budget, forecast, and prior periods without stitching files together by hand.
Your key analyst is on leave for two weeks, over month-end. Does anything break?
How much runs on people remembering. Most teams find their biggest gaps here.
- Routine reports run on a schedule, not because someone remembered to run them.
- Data moves between the CRM, finance, registration, and bank on its own — no manual export and import.
- When a data process breaks, we're alerted — we don't find out from a wrong number.
- Routine reconciliations — collections, escrow, bank — are at least partly automated.
- A key person taking leave doesn't stall reporting or month-end.
- Our processes are written down well enough that a new hire could run them.
- Analysts spend their time on analysis, not copying and pasting.
A regulator, auditor, or investor asks for records tomorrow. Ready — or a fire drill?
Being ready to show your work. Not legal advice, and nobody's marking it.
Operational readiness only — your ability to produce evidence on demand. Not legal advice; confirm your obligations with your own advisors.
- We can produce a clean audit trail for any transaction on request.
- AML checks and records, where they apply to us, are captured as routine — not ad hoc. AML means anti-money-laundering — the checks that confirm who you're really dealing with and flag suspicious funds.
- We could pull the data behind a goAML / REAR submission without a manual scramble. goAML is the UAE regulator's online filing portal; a REAR is the real-estate activity report some firms submit through it. Both need records you can pull on demand.
- Our reporting supports IFRS requirements without heavy period-end rework. IFRS is the set of international accounting standards most companies' financial statements are expected to follow.
- Our corporate-tax figures rest on reconciled numbers we can trace.
- If asked for records tomorrow, we'd be ready in hours, not weeks.
- We know who owns each compliance report and how it's produced.
—
- 0–24Shaky
- 25–49Patchy
- 50–74Manual
- 75–100Strong
—
Tap for whyThe specific gaps behind it — your concrete first moves.
What's behind your number
Each statement scores 1–5. Each pillar is normalised to 0–100 — (sum of its answers − count) ÷ (4 × count) × 100 — so all 1s is 0 and all 5s is 100. Your AUXO Score is the equal-weighted average of the four. No hidden weighting, no curve.
It's a self-read, so it's only as honest as your answers — enough to show you where to look, not a substitute for examining the real systems.
Your answers and result are cached in your browser so you can come back to them. If you've accepted analytics cookies, we record only your score, band, and weakest pillar — never your individual answers. Want a second pair of eyes? AUXO reads these: or email hello@auxodata.com. No pitch — you'll get a straight answer.